The topic is based on an apparently true fact that a person's worth during present days is assessed on the criteria of material possessions & social status rather than moral values such as honesty, integrity, kindness & trust which is agreeable to some extent but is not a completely valid argument for all situations.
The advocates of this theory arguably have some sensible justifications that support the fact that the world is becoming more & more materialistic since it can be observed in our daily life that there is a high competition of new technological inventions & people are desperate to get their hands first on new advanced products. There is also a race for social status as some people have ascribed status but other people are struggling hard to achieve a status. For instance, doctors earn the status of a doctor by succeeding in the medical exams, a professional accountant achieve his status by completing the requirement of a professional accountancy body. It is a common thought among a proportion of people that person who is wealthy, rich and who have high profile social status is deemed to be valuable personality in the society. Among many of the other reasons, a possible reason reason for such reflection might be that people expect that a person who is financially strong can benefit them financially or a person who have solid social status might give them some type of benefit in kind.
However, the question is does that standard to determine the worth of a person really defines the actual meaning of a worthy person. It can be said without any doubt that no one in the world would like to go to a doctor who is famous of being dishonest to his profession & also the shareholders of a large listed company will not be convinced to handover their investment to a mistrusted professional accountant. In all such cases all that matter is so-called old fashioned values known as trust, honesty, integrity & kindness which is the most deserving yardstick in concluding the real worth of a person.
In conclusion, it is merely the perception of a person who is making judgement regarding the worth of a person.
The advocates of this theory arguably have some sensible justifications that support the fact that the world is becoming more & more materialistic since it can be observed in our daily life that there is a high competition of new technological inventions & people are desperate to get their hands first on new advanced products. There is also a race for social status as some people have ascribed status but other people are struggling hard to achieve a status. For instance, doctors earn the status of a doctor by succeeding in the medical exams, a professional accountant achieve his status by completing the requirement of a professional accountancy body. It is a common thought among a proportion of people that person who is wealthy, rich and who have high profile social status is deemed to be valuable personality in the society. Among many of the other reasons, a possible reason reason for such reflection might be that people expect that a person who is financially strong can benefit them financially or a person who have solid social status might give them some type of benefit in kind.
However, the question is does that standard to determine the worth of a person really defines the actual meaning of a worthy person. It can be said without any doubt that no one in the world would like to go to a doctor who is famous of being dishonest to his profession & also the shareholders of a large listed company will not be convinced to handover their investment to a mistrusted professional accountant. In all such cases all that matter is so-called old fashioned values known as trust, honesty, integrity & kindness which is the most deserving yardstick in concluding the real worth of a person.
In conclusion, it is merely the perception of a person who is making judgement regarding the worth of a person.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий